#1 of Doctors, Teachers …and Tom Dick and Harry
One of my dear friend, mentor and renowned professor of mathematics, Dr Gananath used to ask a very relevant question which stayed with me. He used to ask, would you allow someone with a very rudimentary understanding of human body and diseases or someone who has read some books on medicine or attended few workshops and trainings on human anatomy to conduct a surgery on your body ? No, ofcourse not. You would not allow your life, your health in the hands on someone who doesn’t really deeply understand human body and has good solid practice of taking care of human body.
Why , then, we allow just about anyone to open a school and let them conduct a cognitive surgery on our children? Today actors have opened schools, engineers have, doctors have, singers , NRIs, NGOs, IT retired professionals, politicians, criminals, corporates and companies – they all have schools….Everyone just assumes that they understand education better the rest of people and are well versed to intervene into lives our young mind. For some of them it might be a lucrative and respect gaining business, for others it’s their “good” contribution to the society. People with best intentions, end up doing the most damage when one lacks depth of understanding, experience and life.
Don’t you think we should be more demanding of qualification ( not certificates) and capabilities before allowing anyone to start a school i.e. an operation on most vulnerable members of our society?
#2 We really don’t know what is a child…
Unless we truly know what is a child? How a child learns , can we really imagine or create a learning space for them ?
If often ask the stalwarts and experts two fundamental questions that one should explore before getting into education –
- What is a child ?
- What is learning ?
Sadly, I am yet to get a genuine enquiry into these, forget about the answer. All one throws back are bookish, whimsical responses.
People often also mislead a conversation stating modern fashion theorems like – It’s different for each, there cannot be one single definition for all etc.. These narratives of false plurality often simple are excuses and escapes because one doesn’t have deeper understanding or a fair response.
Being exposed to farming, I was able to draw a beautiful parallel. Just like in farming, there cannot be universal guide yet there are some fundamental rules of nature that apply everywhere. For instance, soil health, aligning to natural cycle, right amount of water etc.. one can definitely carve out nature’s law that apply universally, which then needs to be customized locally.
Thus, just like farming, learning has to be contextual and only then it can be sustainable and effective. What will grow here and how will it be grown will be dictated by the context which would involve soil type, people skills, weather, available resources, water etc.
Similarly, growing children, would need to take the context into account and this is why contextual education is important. De- contextual education not only disconnects children from their communities and surroundings but also creates an identity crisis and complexes like inferiority complex or false ambitions.
Is there someone bothered about finding out those natural processes of learning and development before opening next generation school or drafting national education policy ?
#3 Basic of opening a school ?
Opening a new school amidst the popular and cool sounding critique of Macaulay , British enforced mainstream education system is becoming quite common. Engineers who quit corporate life, NRIs who chose to come back , Bright award winning activists, New generation Spiritual Guru’s and their fervent disciples , CSR Fund loaded NGOs – all come forward and open a celebrated school that is sure to attract headlines and may be even win several awards.
The pedagogy, processes and objectives of these schools is either governed by the thoughts of leader or philosophy of a group. What we all tend to miss is to ask this fundamental question – ” What should be the basic of opening a school ?” Is it fair to open a school because I think so and I have had so and so experiences and I have also read so and so….
Is it fair to open a school based on ideas of a celebrated social, religious or spiritual leader ?
It’s definitely easy to do it which is why this is what we see in most places but is it fair is a question that we still need to wonder about!
#4 Some more questions to end with….
What is learning?
What is teaching?
What are age specific needs of a child?
Are these needs universal or different for different child ?
How does an Indian child differ from western child? (if at all)
What is the best time to –
- introduce language (written and reading)
- introduce tech / mobile / screens
- introduce abstract concepts
- introduce??? (other key subjects , arts, skills ? )
What should be the basis of these answers? Western research, Indigenous wisdom , both , none or something else ?
How do children learn or acquire values ?
What could be possible causes of violent or unacceptable behavior of children, what or how much can a school do about it ?
Well the questions are endless and only someone with an spirit of enquiry will be interested, others already have answers.











































